cover
Contact Name
Delila Kania
Contact Email
delila@unpas.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
delila@unpas.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi PPKn, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pasundan. Jl. Tamansari no. 6 – 8, Bandung 40116. Telpon: (022) 4205317
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Civic Edu: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Published by Universitas Pasundan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25800086     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/civicedu.v4i2
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Civic Edu: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan adalah jurnal atau terbitan berkala ilmiah yang digagas dan didirikan dengan tujuan sebagai media publikasi hasil riset dan pengembangan Ilmu dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal ini berfungsi sebagai media diseminasi gagasan, kajian dan hasil penelitian bermutu terkait Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Pendidikan Politik, Pendidikan Hukum dan Pendidikan Interkultural guna mendukung pencapaian tujuan pendidikan nasional dalam bidang Ilmu Kewarganegaraan.
Articles 1 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Civic Edu: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan" : 1 Documents clear
PENERAPAN METODE DISKUSI SEBAGAI SALAH SATU UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KREATIVITAS BELAJAR PPKN PADA MATERI PERLINDUNGAN DAN PEMAJUAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA Abdul Atsar
Civic Edu : Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Civic Edu: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (262.728 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/civicedu.v3i1.1773

Abstract

This study aims to find a solution to the problem of how to improve the creativity of learning PPKn on protection and promotion of human rights in Indonesia through discussion methods at Mathla'ul Anwar Batujaya High School. "This research method uses mixed research with classroom action research methods. The method uses 3 cycles and each cycle consists of 4 steps, namely planning, activities, observation, reflection. Based on observations in cycle 1, the results showed that cycle 1, the average level of student learning creativity was only 63% of students or 27 students included in the category of being creative enough while 37% or 17 students were still in the category of lacking learning creativity. In cycle 2 it can be concluded that the level of student learning creativity starts better than in cycle 1 because based on observations and field notes it is found that students who have creativity in learning in the good category are 71% while in cycle 1 only 63% in the category is good enough the rest in the category is not good even though it is still felt the ability of students' creativity to learn is not optimal because it is not in line with the expectations of researchers that is 95% of students have good criteria. Whereas in cycle 3 the information obtained from the field notes or observations after the cycle 3 was carried out, namely the level of students' learning creativity has increased obtained that students who have a good learning creativity there are 41 people or there are about 95% of the number of students there while in the category enough either there are 3 students or there are about 5%.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1